Rss feed
Get our news by email:
Delivered by FeedBurner
Your Ad Here

FUNTASTICA TOOLS

Add to Google

Subscribe with Bloglines

Add to Technorati Favorites

Bookmark and Share

website stats

Playboy from the 60s

January 18th, 2008 (Posted by Lordy)

It’s always interesting to see how everything in our lives is changing with time. Even Playboy is very different from what it was 50 years ago, although the standard of censorship remained more or less the same. Don’t believe me? Have a look at the post and point to the differences you found in the comments!

playboy in the 60s036_22

playboy in the 60s003_0

playboy in the 60s004_1

playboy in the 60s005_2

playboy in the 60s007_3

playboy in the 60s008_4

playboy in the 60s009_5

playboy in the 60s010_6

playboy in the 60s011_7

playboy in the 60s012_8

playboy in the 60s014_9

playboy in the 60s015_10

playboy in the 60s019_11

playboy in the 60s020_12

playboy in the 60s021_13

playboy in the 60s022_14

playboy in the 60s025_15

playboy in the 60s026_16

playboy in the 60s029_17

playboy in the 60s030_18

playboy in the 60s033_19

playboy in the 60s034_20

playboy in the 60s035_21

playboy in the 60s037_23

playboy in the 60s038_24

playboy in the 60s039_25

playboy in the 60s040_26

playboy in the 60s041_27

playboy in the 60s042_28

playboy in the 60s043_29

playboy in the 60s002_30

Your Ad Here

11 Responses to “Playboy from the 60s”

  • so this is what hot women looked like before Photoshop
    i see, my understanding of beauty needs reconsideration

  • Real non-anorectic, non-photoshoped girls. Beauty.

  • oh and no silicon, lipo or any other nip tuck crap girls!
    just plain

  • To me, the most obvious difference between the Playboy of our fathers, and Playboy today is back then you NEVER saw anything below a woman’s belt line. In other words, no vaginas, and very few pubes. (Although women back then tended to have more pubes, if you catch my drift.)

  • “Although women back then tended to have more pubes, if you catch my drift”

    I think we all catch your drift, seeing as how you spelled it out n all.

  • The girls are hotter now, but they were sexier then.

  • well the question is, why are they hotter now, if they really are?
    is it because of our new understanding of beauty or because they grow better nowadays or because of plastic surgery/photoshop?

    its very unlikely that girls just became prettier. if, e.g. you take a look at the young jane fonda, she was GORGEOUS! even compared to todays standards she would be one or maybe even the most attractive women in the film biz.

    sure, now and back then beauty was in the eye of the beholder, so its hard to say what is actually hotter…

    @ Jeff
    and about the pubes: yes, back then that part was left to our imagination. close ups of certain areas of the female gender might be hot to wank to, but never were “sexy”… just pure sex

  • watch this, if you want to see some makeup plus photoshop magic!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcFlxSlOKNI&feature=related

  • 2nd picture resembles late Jackie Kennedy.

  • The women of the past were more sexy and natural. I love women with pubic hair and alot of it, so that’s my era.

  • FYI: These women are old enough to be your moms or grandmas by now. Oh yeah, by the way… Damn

Leave a Reply


CURRENT POLL

A Genie Grants You Only 1 of the Following Wishes. Which Would You Pick?








Loading ... Loading ...

NEW COMMENTS

Links